September 2, 2010

Traumatic Brain Injury a "Disease" not an "Event"

Traumatic Brain Injury Claims

New research published in this months issue of the Journal of Neurotrauma advocates treating traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease process, rather than an isolated event.

As a brain injury lawyer, I wholeheartedly agree with the conclusions reached in the article.

Brain Injury the Beginning of a Process

The authors of the study, Brent E. Masel and Douglas S. DeWitt from the Univesity of Texas Department of Neurology state that:

The purpose of this article is to encourage the classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as the beginning of a chronic disease process, rather than an event or final outcome. Head trauma is the beginning of an ongoing, perhaps lifelong, process that impacts multiple organ systems and may be disease causative and accelerative.

The authors review how a brain injury is often the start of a degenerative process that may cause further injury, even death, months or years after the initial trauma. The conclusions reached by the authors no doubt will be supported by brain injury survivors, their family's and those that advocate for survivors.

Chronic traumatic brain injury disease should be reimbursed and managed on a par with all other chronic diseases. Only then will the individuals with this condition get the medical surveillance, support, and treatment they so richly deserve. Only then will brain-injury research receive the funding it requires. Only then will we be able to truly talk about a cure.

Bookmark and Share

August 11, 2010

Citizens Group says N.B. Insurance Cap Unfair

Consumer's Group Calls For Review of Minor Injury Cap

The CBC has reported that a group of concerned citizens has formed a new consumers action group calling for a review of New Brunswick's "minor injury" cap on car accident insurance claims.

Frances McConnachie is a member of N.B. Consumers for Insurance Fairness. McConnachie was quoted as saying she received $2,500 following an accident in 2004 that has left her with back and neck problems that limit her activities and make her reliant on therapy and pain killers.

Victims Share Stories

The group has started a Facebook page where N.B. accident victims can share their stories, provide support, and get information about the groups effforts to get the N.B. Government to repeal the $2500.00 limit on compensation for so called minor injuries.

I would encourage any readers from New Brunswick to join the fight for fairness!

N.S. Changed Minor Injury Law

After the NDP won the last election here in Nova Scotia, they fullfilled one of their election promises by making improvements to the minor injury cap here in N.S.

The amount of the cap was increased to $7500.00 and the number of people whose claims will be unfairly limited by the cap have been reduced.

Related posts:

Nova Scotia’s Minor Injury Cap: NDP Makes “Minor” Improvements

Court of Appeal Confirms Minor Injury Cap - NDP to Repeal Cap Law

Bookmark and Share

July 30, 2010

What is a Pecuniary Loss in a Personal Injury Claim?

There are generally two types of losses that your personal injury lawyer will try to recover on your behalf.

Non Pecuniary Losses

Non pecuniary losses are losses or harms that cannot be precisely measured or valued. For example, the most common type of non-pecuniary loss is compensation for “pain and suffering”.

See for example Nova Scotia Personal Injury Claims: How Much Is My “Pain and Suffering” Worth?

Pecuniary Losses

On the other hand pecuniary losses are financial losses that can be precisely measured. They may involve out of pocket expenses for things like medical treatment, travel expenses or funeral expenses.

The largest pecuniary loss that most personal injury victims suffer is their loss of income. If someone is seriously injured as a result of someone's negligence they are entitled to be compensated for their pecuniary losses for their past loss of income to the date of settlement or trial, as well as any ongoing income losses they may continue to suffer in the future.

In wrongful death cases, family members are entitled to recover for the pecuniary loss of income that the deceased family member provided to support the family.

Expert Evidence

Pecuniary losses may be difficult to calculate. Typically this part of the claim requires the services of an expert. See for example, Experts in Personal Injury Claims.

In most cases your personal injury lawyer will hire an economist or an actuary to figure out exactly what your pecuniary losses have been to date and how much your pecuniary losses will be in the future. Economist and actuaries use tables, guidelines and statistics to help determine how much money you would have earned over your lifetime. Obviously, there is no such thing as a crystal ball and future losses can never be determined with absolute certainty.

Your lawyer will take into account what are called negative contingencies. For example, the chance that you may have been fired, that your company would go bankrupt or that you may have been injured in some other way.

On the other hand, the expert will also determine the “positive contingencies” like raises, bonuses and promotions that might have increased your income in the future.

Continue reading "What is a Pecuniary Loss in a Personal Injury Claim?" »

July 28, 2010

Pain and Suffering Awards in Canada: Taxable or not?

"Do I have to pay income tax on my personal injury award?"

I get asked this question a lot. The short answer is, at least until the government changes the Income Tax Act, personal injury awards in Canada are not taxable.

In Canada, compensation for non-pecuniary damages (what is typically referred to as “pain and suffering”) is not considered taxable income. However, if you invest the money that you receive, any interest, profit or gain that you receive from those investments is taxable.

For example, say you receive $100,000.00 in compensation for your “pain and suffering” claim. The entire award is tax free.

However, if you take that $100,000.00 and buy an investment that earns 5% interest per year, the $5,000.00 you earn each year will be considered taxable income.

There are tools that your personal injury lawyer can use to ensure that investments from your injury settlement are tax free.

In certain circumstances your personal injury lawyer may recommend that you place your settlement funds into an investment known as a “structured settlement”.

A structured settlement is a type of investment, known as an annuity, where you purchase an insurance contract that entitles you to receive periodic payments (usually monthly) over a specific time frame (which may be a specific number of years or even your entire life).

All of the payments, including any increase in value of the payments over time, are tax free.

Structured settlements are not right for every personal injury claim. There are advantages and disadvantages that you will need to discuss with your personal injury lawyer.

Structured settlements can be complicated and your lawyer will probably retain the services of an expert to determine whether a structured settlement is right for you and what the appropriate terms of the structured settlement should be.


Bookmark and Share

July 26, 2010

Slip and Fall Claims: 10 Questions You Need To Answer

If you have been injured as a result of a “slip and fall” or “trip and fall” there are 10 questions that you should know the answer to before you call a lawyer. Knowing the answers to these questions will help the personal injury lawyer evaluate whether or not you have a claim that is worth pursuing.

10 Questions:

1. What was the weather like on the day that you fell?

2. What kind of shoes were you wearing? (Keep the shoes. Take pictures).

3. Do you wear glasses or contact lenses? (Were you wearing them when you fell?)

4. Do you have any medical history of dizziness or falling?

5. Do you take any medication that makes you dizzy?

6. What caused you to slip or trip? (Take pictures if you can).

7. Had you had any alcohol to drink on the day you fell?

8. Were there any witnesses to your fall? (Get their names, and contact information)

9. Did you file an accident/incident report with the property owner or police?

10. If your fall was caused by a dangerous condition, how long do you think the conditions existed before you fell?

Knowing the answers to these questions will help the personal injury lawyer evaluate whether or not you have a claim that is worth pursuing.


Bookmark and Share

July 14, 2010

Embrace Life!

I don't think I have ever seen a more effective educational video promoting seatbelt use.

Watch the video here: Embrace Life

imagesCALIJJXE.jpg

In the past 10 years, more than 30,000 Canadians have died in car crashes.

Today 93% of Canadians use their seat belts.

The 7% of Canadians that do not wear seat belts account for almost 40% of motor vehicle accident deaths!

Bookmark and Share

July 6, 2010

Bicycle Helmets Save Lives - Prevent Brain Injury

I bought my son Liam a new bike this past weekend. He just couldn't wait to get outside and go riding with his friends. But he had to wait while I made sure that his new bicycle helmet fit him properly.

Summertime is Bicycle Time

With warm weather and summer vacation the number of children on bikes increases dramatically. So do the number of children attending hospital emergency rooms with head injuries.

Last month I read an article about bicycle helmet use by a pediatric neurosurgeon from Winnepeg's Children's Hospital expressing concern about Manitoba's "dismal" rate of helmet use. Only 22% of Manitoba cyclists wear a helmet when they ride.

Almost Half of Canadians Don't Wear Helmets

According to Statistics Canada's Community Health Survey :

Among the 11.4 million people aged 12 and over who reported bicycling in the past year, almost half (46%) never wore a helmet.

Can you believe that there are still people who refuse to wear a helmet when they ride a bike?

Good News Bad News

The good news, at least here in Nova Scotia, is that we have gone from one of the lowest rates of helmet use in the country to the highest (66%) since the province introduced legislation making helmet use mandatory. But even with laws that require helmets more than 4 out of 10 Nova Scotians still insist on risking their lives, and their brains, by riding unprotected.

BikeHelmetSafety.gif

How to Properly Fit a Helmet

So as a public service I have included a link to an article on helmets.org which explains how to properly fit a bicycle helmet.

So have a great summer and please make sure you and your loved ones wear a helmet!

Continue reading "Bicycle Helmets Save Lives - Prevent Brain Injury" »

Bookmark and Share

June 28, 2010

Class Action involving "disgraced" pathologist to proceed: NB Ct. of Appeal

Dr. R. Menon tried to stop a class action filed against him by patients whose test results were mis-read by Menon.

The New Bruswick Court of Appeal ruled last week that the class action can proceed.

I have been following this fiasco for the last two years. For more information you can take a look a some of my past posts:

Pathologist Menon Should Have Been Fired Years Ago: N.B. Inquiry

Disgraced Pathologist Menon “Sorry” but Blames Everyone in Sight

Disgraced Pathologist Menon's Work had 'Big Problems': New Brunswick

Health Authority Knew About Pathologist's Problems: Miramichi

Perhaps now the parties can get down to the real issue. Compensating the victims who were injured or died, because they didn't receive treatment for cancer, because of the problems with Menon's work.

Bookmark and Share

June 8, 2010

Brain Injury Awareness: BIANS (Hfx) presents mini-film festival

June is Brain Injury Awareness Month.

Every year in Nova Scotia between 2200 and 3500 people sustain a brain injury through a variety of ways such as falls, motor vehicle accidents, strokes, near drowning and aneurysms. No one recovers 100% from a brain injury. Dealing with the effects of brain injury is a lifelong journey for brain injury survivors and their families. The Brain Injury Association of Nova Scotia works to enhance the quality of life for survivors and their families.

To promote Brain Injury Awareness Month, the Halifax Chapter of the Brain Injury Association is inviting the public to two special movie viewings this month in the Royal Bank Theatre at the Halifax Infirmary on Summer Street.

On June 23rd at 7:30 pm the movie 'Braindamadj'd Take II' will be shown. On June 29th at 7:30 pm the documentary movie 'Breakaway' will be shown with a post-movie discussion with the subjects and producer of the film.

There will be no admission charged to these movie showings, but donations to the Brain Injury Association of Nova Scotia will be accepted at the door.

For more information contact HalifaxBIANS@gmail.com.

Bookmark and Share

May 27, 2010

Supreme Court of Canda Refuses to Hear Appeal on N.S. Minor Injury Cap

Injured Victim's Constitutional Appeal Fails

Today the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear an appeal of a decision that upheld the constitutionality of Nova Scotia's cap of $2500.00 compensation for injured car accident victims deemed to have suffered a "minor injury".

The Applicant MacDonald was involved in a car accident in November, 2003. She suffered soft tissue injuries to her neck, shoulders and back. Her insurance company claimed that she had suffered a "minor injury" under Nova Scotia's new auto insurance provisions and offered a settlement that included the capped amount of $2,500 for pain and suffering.

The other Applicant Gionet was in a car accident in December, 2003. She suffered soft tissue injuries to her knee and back. She accepted the insurance company's offer of $3,000 to settle her claim for pain and suffering and for loss of wages.

Victims Claimed "Minor Injury" CAP Discriminatory

The plaintiffs applied to challenge the constitutionality of amendments to the N.S. Insurance Act that "capped" damages for "minor" injuries, as defined in the legislation, at $2,500.00. The plaintiff's claimed the law discriminated on the basis of physical disability and sex. They also contended the Regulations promulgated under the Act were ultra vires.

Supreme Court Upheld "Minor Injury" Cap

Justice Walter Goodfellow of the Nova Scotia Supreme Court upheld the legislation.

Benefits of “Minor Injury” Cap Legislation does not Justify Discrimination

Court of Appeal Confirmed Trial Decision

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff's appeals. They appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Court of Appeal Confirms Minor Injury Cap - NDP to Repeal Cap Law

Supreme Court of Canada

In a decision released today the S.C.C. ruled:

"The motions for an extension of time to serve and file the first and second applications for leave to appeal are granted. The first application for leave to appeal...is dismissed without costs. The second application for leave to appeal...is dismissed with costs to the respondents Adam Thomas Roy and Attorney General of Nova Scotia."

That's All Folks

The S.C.C. decision marks the end of the line. If you or a family memeber have been injured in a car accident since November 2003 your claim will be determined based on the amendments to the Insurance Act that caps compensation for "pain and suffering" for "minor" injuries at $2500.00.

Recent Changes to Cap

The NDP government introcuced changes to the "minor injury" cap recently. Unfortunately, they did not scrap the cap as many injured victims had hoped. The cap remains in place. There were some improvements made to the cap. But they will not apply retroactively.

Nova Scotia’s Minor Injury Cap: NDP Makes “Minor” Improvements

Get Advice!

Now more than ever it is important for injured accident victims to get advice from an experienced Nova Scotia Car Accident Lawyer.

Which version of the legislation applies to your claim? Is your claim is capped? What evidence do you need to prove that your claim isn't capped? What compensation you are entitled to in addition to the cap? These are all questions that are best answered by an experienced motor vehicle accident lawyer.

Continue reading "Supreme Court of Canda Refuses to Hear Appeal on N.S. Minor Injury Cap " »

Bookmark and Share

May 12, 2010

Brain Injury Survivors Face Long Waits for Services

Survivors of traumatic brain injuries face long waits for treatment and rehabilitation services.

No Service the Norm

The president of the Brain Injury Association of Canada, Shirley Johnson, says that for persons who have suffered brain injuries shortages of programs, long waiting lists or simply no access to services at all, is the norm in most areas of the country.

Help Us Change That

June is Brain Injury Awareness Month in Nova Scotia. The Brain Injury Association of Nova Scotia is hosting 18 Holes for Hope on Monday June 21, 2010 at the Brightwood Golf and Country Club.

This is one of BIANS major fundraisers. There are still a few spaces available for anyone who wants to come out and support brain injury awareness. You can contact me through this blog if you want more information.

Bookmark and Share

May 8, 2010

Nova Scotia’s Minor Injury Cap: NDP Makes “Minor” Improvements

Nova Scotia has a cap on the amount of compensation that innocent victims are entitled to receive when they have been injured in a car accident.

I have posted before about the unfairness of Nova Scotia’s minor injury cap. For example, see Benefits of “Minor Injury” Cap Legislation does not Justify Discrimination

Promise to Scrap the Cap

The NDP campaigned on a promise to do away with the $2,500.00 minor injury cap. Most people believed that the NDP intended to scrap the cap altogether since that was the fairest thing to do.

NDP Increases Cap to $7,500.00

However, on April 28, 2010, the NDP Government introduced changes to Nova Scotia’s minor injury cap. Unfortunately, the cap remains in place. The amount of the cap has been increased to $7,500.00 and some minor improvements have been made to the legislation which will allow more accident victims to recover more compensation.

The legislation was passed on May 7, 2010 but the "new" cap will not take effect until it is proclaimed in force.

"Does the Cap Apply to My Claim?"

I get asked that question a lot. Unfortunately there is no single answer. If you have been injured in a car accident you should get the advice of an experienced Nova Scotia Car Accident lawyer.

$2,500.00 Cap Still Applies to "Old" Claims

One of the key issues that the NDP Government had to struggle with was whether any improvements to the minor injury cap would be made “retroactive”. In other words, would the benefits be extended to anyone who has been injured since the minor injury legislation came into affect in November 2003, or would they only apply on a “go forward” basis? Unfortunately, the NDP Government has decided not to make the improvements retroactive.

Anyone who has been injured in a car accident since November 2003 is stuck with the draconian and unfair $2,500.00 minor injury cap.

Amount of Compensation under "New" Minor Injury Cap

As I mentioned, while the minor injury cap remains in place the amount of compensation that injured victims are entitled to recover has increased from $2,500.00 to $7,500.00. While this is an improvement, innocent accident victims who may end up suffering significant injuries that cause pain for the rest of their life will be limited to the maximum recovery of $7,500.00.

In my view this simply isn’t reasonable.

Sprains, Strains and Whiplash

The definition for the old $2,500.00 cap eliminated the vast majority of injury claims, including people who suffered fractures, some forms of disfiguring injuries, and long term chronic pain.

The new definition will focus on limiting compensation to persons who have suffered sprains strains and certain kinds of whiplash. This is certainly more in line with what the insurance industry asked for when they were lobbying for the original minor injury cap.

Details Matter

However, as always, the “devil is in the details” and how the regulations define what is covered by the cap and what is not covered by the cap will ultimately have a huge impact on the fairness (or unfairness) of this new legislation.

So what does it all mean?

There is no question that a cap of $7,500.00 is better than a cap of $2,500.00.

There is no question that limiting the types of injuries that the minor injury cap applies to is an improvement.

Bad Law Bad Policy

However, I believe that placing a cap on the amount of compensation that innocent injured car accident victims are entitled to receive in order to increase insurance company profits is bad law and bad public policy.

Making minor improvements to a bad law does not make the law fair nor does it make it good public policy. I represent hundreds of injured accident victims who have been waiting to resolve their claims in hope that the NDP Government would do the right thing and scrap the minor injury cap altogether. They now face the prospects of having to deal with their claims under the egregiously unfair provisions of the $2,500.00 minor injury cap.

Continue reading "Nova Scotia’s Minor Injury Cap: NDP Makes “Minor” Improvements " »

Bookmark and Share